Which is better Wikipedia or Quora?

Which is better Wikipedia or Quora?

Both are accurate and reliable. Quora is about sharing knowledge. It’s a people and their experiences centric platform. Wikipedia is about establishing and making factual information available.

Is Wikipedia more reliable?

Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. Because, as a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong.

Is Quora a reliable source?

If you’re not familiar with Quora, it is a question-and-answer site similar to Yahoo! Answers where users can ask questions, and answer other’s questions. The truth is, Quora is only as reliable as the person answering your question, and your question is only as useful as the details you provide.

READ:   What is the difference between diagnostic radiography and radiotherapy?

How accurate and reliable is Wikipedia?

The paper found that Wikipedia’s entries had an overall accuracy rate of 80 percent, whereas the other encyclopedias had an accuracy rate of 95 to 96 percent. They asked experts to rate article content with regard to accuracy, up-to-dateness, breadth of coverage, referencing and readability.

How good is Quora?

In that sense Quora is not reliable. But a good question can reliably get a wide range of responses, and that is nearly always interesting at least. But unless people are prepared to offer references or links to other reliable sources, much of the material posted as answers and discussion can be hard to verify.

What is the most reliable source of information?

Academic journal articles are probably the most reliable source of current thinking in your field. To be the most reliable they need to be peer reviewed. This means that other academics have read them before publication and checked that they are making claims that are backed up by their evidence.

READ:   Where did Athens defeat Persia?

Is Wikipedia a reliable source for academic research?

Wikipedia – Academic Use Wikipedia is not considered a credible source. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from students to professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything.

Is quara com legit?

Quora has a consumer rating of 1.77 stars from 530 reviews indicating that most customers are generally dissatisfied with their purchases. Consumers complaining about Quora most frequently mention social media, real name and free speech problems. Quora ranks 42nd among Question And Answer sites.

Why Quora is best Quora?

Quora is so great because it mimics real life. In real life things are sustained only if they are useful. Only content that is really useful is promoted, by Quora’s mechanisms and by the users. The concept of credits makes people a lot more responsible while asking and answering questions.

Should you use Wikipedia as a credible resource?

Although Wikipedia is a good place to start your research, it is not a credible source that you should use to cite from. Wikipedia allows multiple users to edit, and it is not safe to assume that the facts presented there have been checked before publishing them.

READ:   What is Russia doing to modernize its armed forces?

Why is Wikipedia an unreliable source?

Wikipedia generally uses reliable secondary sources,which vet data from primary sources.

  • Always be careful of what you read: it might not be consistently accurate.
  • Neither articles on Wikipedia nor websites that mirror Wikipedia can be used as sources,because this is circular sourcing.
  • Is Wikipedia an unreliable source?

    Wikipedia is an unreliable source because regular, everyday people are the people who are writing the articles. Therefore, some of the information the put up may come out as wrong, unreal, and / or biased. This is the reason why Wikipedia is an unreliable source.

    Is wikipedia trustworthy?

    The online encyclopedia does not consider itself to be a reliable source and discourages readers from using it in academic or research settings. Researchers, teachers, journalists, and public officials do not regard Wikipedia as a reliable source.